Catalog :




Detail Article

INSAN Media Psikologi

ISSN 1411-2671 (Cetak); 2310-7945 (Online)

Vol. 9 / No. 1 / Published : 2007-04

Related with : Scholar   Yahoo!   Bing

Original Article :

Keterkaitan antara nilai dan penilaian keadilan

Author :

  1. Joko Kuncoro*1
  1. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang

Abstract :

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between a set of independent variables in the set 1 (achievement value, power value, hedonism value, benevolence value, conformity value and universalism value/X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, and X6) and a set of dependent variables in the set 2 (procedural justice judgment and distributive justice judgment/Y1 and Y2). Test of relationship between two sets of variables has been done twice to proof the major hypothesis. The first relationship is between variables in the set 1 (achievement value , power value, hedonism value/X1, X2 and X3) and variables in the set 2 (procedural justice judgment and distributive justice judgment /Y1, and Y2). The second relationship is between variables in the set 1 (X4, X5, and X6) and variables in the set 2 (procedural justice judgment and distributive justice judgment/ Y1, Y2). The data of all variables were collected using questionnaires, Schwartz Values Survey designed by Schwartz (1994) for independent variables and the questionnairy designed by Moorman (1991) and Colquitt (2001) for dependent variables. The data was analyzed using partial correlation to measures the relationship between each independent variable and each of dependent variable by controlling one or more other variables. Canonical analyze was used to measure the correlation among one set of independent variable and one set of dependent variable. Result showed that: 1) there is significant relationship between variable in the set 1 (X1, X2, X3) and the variable in the set 2 (Y1, Y2) with canonical coefficient = 0.390; 2) there significant relationship between variable in the set 1 (X4, X5, X6) and the variable in the set 2 (Y1, Y2) with canonical coefficient = 0.417. Analyze to examine the first minor hypothesis (1a – 1e) that is between each variable in set 1 and each variable in set 2 showed that only one of the six relationships was significant. Analyze to examine the second minor hypothesis (2a – 2e) that is between each variable in set 1 and each variable in set 2 showed that no significant correlation for all relationship.

Keyword :

achievement value, power value, hedonism value, benevolence value, conformity value, universalism value, procedural justice judgment, distributive justice judgment,


References :

  1. Arief Budiman, (1996). Teori Pembangunan.. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  2. A. Colquitt, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  3. Jason, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  4. E. Donal Conlon, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  5. Yee K. Ng, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  6. J. Wesson, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  7. Michael, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  8. Christoper Porter, (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  9. A. Jason. Colquitt, (2001). On The Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Cosntruct Validation of a Measure. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3)
  10. Russel Cropanzano, (1999). Effects of Justice on Discrete Emotions. . : Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5)
  11. Kathlenn Suckow, (1999). Effects of Justice on Discrete Emotions.. : Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5)
  12. M. Howard Weiss, (1999). Effects of Justice on Discrete Emotions.. : Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5)
  13. Faturochman, (2002). Keadilan: Perpektif Psikologi.. Jogjakarta : Pustaka Pelajar dan Unit Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi UGM
  14. N. T. Feather, (1990). Reactions to Equal Reward Allocations: Effects of Situation, Gender and Values.. : British Journal of Social Psychology, 29
  15. N. T. Feather, (1994). Human Values and Their Reaction to Justice.. : Journal of Social Issues, 50(4)
  16. A. Allan Lind, (1992). Procedural Justice and Culture.. : International Journal of Psychology, 27(2)
  17. P. Christopher Early, (1992). Procedural Justice and Culture.. : International Journal of Psychology, 27(2)
  18. Kwok Leung, (1988). “The Cross-Cultural Chalenge to Social Psychology” (eds): Theoretical Advances in Justice Behavior: Some Cross Cultural Inputs.. California : Sage Publication Newbury Park.
  19. H. Robert Moorman, (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perception Influence Employee Citizenship?. : Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6)
  20. Milton Rokeach, (1973). The Nature of Human Values.. New York : The Free Press
  21. M. G. Shafto, (2005). Canonical Correlation Analysis of Data on Human-Automation Interaction. . : www. a.gov/IH Publication/Shafto/Canonical Correlation. html.
  22. Asaf Degani, (2005). Canonical Correlation Analysis of Data on Human-Automation Interaction. : www. a.gov/IH Publication/Shafto/Canonical Correlation. html.
  23. H. Shalom Schwartz, (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Stucture and Contents of Humans Values?. : Journal of Social Issues, 50(4)
  24. R. Tom Tyler, (1994). Psychological Models of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice.. : Journal of Personaliy and Social Psychology, 67(5)
  25. Kees Van den bos, (1998). Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Procesess in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgements.. : Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6)
  26. A. Allan Lind, (1998). Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Procesess in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgements. : Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6)
  27. Riel Vermunt, (1998). Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Procesess in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgements.. : Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6)
  28. A.M. Henk Wilke, (1998). Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Procesess in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgements.. : Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6)


   


Archive Article

Cover Media Content

Volume : 9 / No. : 1 / Pub. : 2008-05
  1. Wife’s perception of husband’s support in pursuing her career in relation to wife’s marital satisfaction among working wives in metro manila
  2. Karakteristik pemimpin dan gaya kepemimpinan dalam konteks indonesia
  3. Keterkaitan antara nilai dan penilaian keadilan
  4. Keyakinan peran gender pemimpin gereja
  5. Dinamika pasien paliatif dalam menghadapi kematian
  6. Overconfidence in clinical judgment prevents the accuracy of judgment