Catalog :



Detail Article

Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik

ISSN : Lama 0216-2407, Baru 2086-7050

Vol. 21 / No. 4 / Published : 2008-10

TOC : 2, and page :291 - 297

Related with : Scholar   Yahoo!   Bing

Original Article :

Social Conflict and Control Over Forest Land in Lampung

Konflik Sosial dan Kontrol terhadap Lahan Hutan di Lampung

Author :

  1. Muryani --> Staf Akademik Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Airlangga / muryani2005@yahoo.com.au

Abstract :

This study analyses how Government forest policy in Lampung has changed, and the various socio-economic impacts of such inconsistency. It also explains land conflict between the society and the local government. It is argued that new policies have ignored local people’s property rights and customary law, and in doing so have generated prolonged conflict in the forests of Lampung. Finally, conclusions are drawn that the implementation of the Consensus Forest Land Use Plan (TGHK, Tata Guna Hutan Kesepakatan) has tended to ignore the social forest land use rights and customary law. Many local people who seed their agricultural plantations on customary lands find their investments seized by local government in exercise of their formal rights of access. This leads to social dissatisfaction and ineffective environmental conservation. In addition, the government prefers to give forest extraction concessions to large companies. Local communities are marginalized and it has increased impoverishment in the area. It is suggested that the forest conservation and protection cannot be achieved without involving local communities in order to get legitimacy. It is these communities that have interacted most intimately with the forests over a period of time, and they are likely the ones who know how the problems can better be managed.

Keyword :

forest, conflict, policy, local community, government, socio-economic impact,


Daftar Pustaka :

  1. A. Agrawal, (1999). ‘Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation’ ,World Development, Vol.27, No.4. . , : Pergamonhttp://www.personal.umich.edu/~arunagra/papers/Enchantment%20and%20Disenchantment.pdf, diakses 23/02/2007.
  2. C.C. Gibson, (1999). ‘Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation’ ,World Development, Vol.27, No.4. . , : Pergamonhttp://www.personal.umich.edu/~arunagra/papers/Enchantment and Disenchantment.pdf, diakses 23/02/2007.
  3. F.V. Brenda- Beckmann, (1989). ‘Scape Goat and Magic Charm : law in development theory and practice’ . Padang, Indonesia : Seminar paper ,June 1988
  4. R. M. Dick, (2004). 'Collective Actions and Property Rights for Sustainable Development; understanding property rights’, . Washington D.C. : International Food Policy Research Institute, brief 3 of 16
  5. P. Dauvergne, (1997). ‘Weak States and the Environment in Indonesia and the Solomon Islands’, Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Working Paper No.10. Canberra : http://www.netstoreusa.com/aubooks/090/0909524106.shtml
  6. R. Elmhirst, (2001). ‘Resource Struggles and The Politics of Place in North Lampung, Indonesia’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 22(3) . National University of Singapore : http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/sjtg/2001/00000022/00000003/art00111;jsessionid=c2ddl3qk91fh7.victoria , 17/02/2007
  7. Forest Watch Indonesia Forest Watch Indonesia, (2000). ‘Apa Kabar Hutan Lampung (What is going on Lampung Forest’, Bogor.. : http://fwi.or.id/index.php?link=news&id=157
  8. H. Kartodiharjo, (1999). Masalah Kebijaksanaan Pengelolaan Hutan Alam Produksi (The Problem of Protection Forests Management Policy) . Bogor : LATIN
  9. A. Kusworo, (2000). Perambah Hutan atau Kambing Hitam? (Forest Poachers or A Scape Goat). Bogor : LATIN
  10. J. F. Mc Carthy, (2002). ’The Changing Regime: Forest Property and Reformasi in Indonesia’, Development and Change, vol. 31. : http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/dech/2000/00000031/00000001/art00148
  11. R. Mendelson, (1994). ’Property Rights and Tropical Deforestation’, Oxford Economic Paper, 46 . : http://www.jstor.org/view/00307653/di015410/01p01104/0
  12. J.F. Mc Carthy, (2002). Power and Interest on Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier: clientelist coalitions, illegal logging and conservation in the Alas Valley’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 33(1)February. United Kingdom : http://www.journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=98871, diakses 27/02/2007.
  13. J.F. Mc Carthy, (2006). The Forth Circle: a political ecology of Sumatra’s rainforest frontier. California : Stanford University Press Stanford
  14. G. Michon, (2000). ’The Damar Agroforests of Krui, Indinesia: Justice for Forest Farmers’. : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Michon%22+%22damar+agroforests+*+Krui%22
  15. H. De Foresta, (2000). ’The Damar Agroforests of Krui, Indinesia: Justice for Forest Farmers’. : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
  16. A. Kusworo, (2000). ’The Damar Agroforests of Krui, Indinesia: Justice for Forest Farmers’. : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
  17. Levang Levang, (2000). ’The Damar Agroforests of Krui, Indinesia: Justice for Forest Farmers’. : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
  18. E. Ostrom, (2002). ‘The Formation of Property Rights’, Ecological, Economic, Cultural and Political Principles of Institutions for The Environment
    . Washington D.C. : http://webct.anu.edu.au/SCRIPT/EMDV8101_Sem_1_2006/scripts/serve_home
  19. SAM SAM, (1987). ‘Forest Resources Crisis in The World’ . Penang, Malaysia : Proceeding of the Conference
  20. A. Steele, (1987). Indonesia’s decentralization law is causing headaches in Dusun Belido, Journalism and International Affairs, . Ohio : http://www.insideindonesia.org/edit80/p9-10steele.html
  21. S. Suyanto, (2004). ‘Land Tenure, Agroforestry Adoption, and Reduction of Fire Hazard in a Forest Zone: A case study from Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia’, World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor . Ohio : http://www.worldagroforestry.org/SEA/Publications/files/journal/JA0013-04.PDF
  22. T. H. Titienberg, (2004). Environmental Economic and Policy. USA : Peason Education Press
  23. P. Vandergeest, (1996). ’ Territorialization of Forest Rights in Thailand: society and Natural resources’, Vol 9. : Peason Education Presshttp://office.geog.uvic.ca/shrimp/Pages/Researchers/vandergeest


   


Archive Article

Cover Media Content

Volume : 21 / No. : 4 / Pub. : 2008-01
  1. Social Construction Of Consumptivism, And The Role Of Architecture: A Perspective Of Architectural Sociology
  2. Social Conflict And Control Over Forest Land In Lampung
  3. Social Impact Assessment: Can And Should It Empower Community?
  4. Perubahan Ekosistem Di Lahan Kering
  5. Disparitas Antar Wilayah Di Jawa Timur
  6. Kebijakan Pengampunan Pajak (tax Amnesty) (perspektif Kerangka Kerja Implementasi Sunset Policy Mendasarkan Uu No 28 Tahun 2007 )
  7. Indegenisasi Dan Reproduksi Pengetahuan Kapitalisme Dalam Jaringan Kekuasaan Di Dunia Ketiga
  8. Kerjasama Kontra-terorisme Indonesia-australia: Perbandingan Antara Masa Pemerintahan Megawati Soekarnoputri Dan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
  9. Tindakan Pemerintah Indonesia Dan Pemerintah Arab Saudi Dalam Menangani Permasalahan Tki Di Arab Saudi