Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional
ISSN 2302-8777
Vol. 6 / No. 2 / Published : 2017-07
Order : 19, and page :209 - 221
Related with : Scholar Yahoo! Bing
Original Article :
Ketidakefektifan international tribunal for the law of the sea dalam konflik konservasi southern bluefin tuna
Author :
- Ajeng Miftakhul Diba Fallahira*1
- Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Abstract :
Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) had a massive pressure as the result of commercial fishing in early 1960s. Japan had a big role as a consumer of SBT with the largest amount of fishing and had violated Australia’s and New Zealand’s sea territories. Australia, New Zealand, and Japan cooperated and formed CCSBT as a result. Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT) have purposes to manage, do conservations, and to utilize SBT appropriately. Even though the rules and laws of CCSBT had applied to the states, Japan still violated them. The violation Japan did had made Australia and New Zealand brought the dispute to International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). ITLOS considered ineffective in solving the dispute between them. ITLOS’ effectivity is questionable, since it has no significant role and tends to broaden the dispute.
Keyword :
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Australia, New Zealand, Japan, International Institution,
References :
Bialek, Dean,(2000) . “Australia & New Zealand v Japan: Southern Bluefin Tuna Case†Vol. 1, hal. 1-9 : Melbourne Journal of International Law





